The slide is titled "Ailian Community Walkability Measurement Tool Design," featuring the Chinese equivalent "爱联社区步行可行性测量工具设计." Its subtitle, "Assessing Walkability and Proposing Improvement Strategies," outlines the tool's purpose in evaluating pedestrian accessibility and suggesting enhancements for the community.

爱联社区步行可行性测量工具设计

Assessing Walkability and Proposing Improvement Strategies

Source: Designing a Walkability Measurement Tool for Ailian Community

The agenda slide outlines a presentation on assessing and improving walkability in the Ailian Community, starting with an introduction to the project background and the development of a measurement tool. It proceeds to cover the framework and tool design using a multi-dimensional structure with questionnaires, observations, and scoring; data collection from 14 samples highlighting issues like poor road conditions and facility shortages; and concludes with analysis, recommendations for safety enhancements, and steps toward a walkable community.

演示议程

1. 1. Introduction and Project Background

Assess walkability in Ailian Community and develop measurement tool for improvements.

2. 2. Framework and Tool Design

Multi-dimensional walkability structure with questionnaire, observation, and scoring system.

3. 3. Data Collection and Findings

Survey 14 samples revealing issues like road conditions and facility shortages.

4. 4. Analysis, Recommendations, and Conclusion

Validate tool, suggest safety enhancements, and outline path to walkable community. Source: Designing a Walkability Measurement Tool for Ailian Community

This slide outlines the project background focused on assessing the walkability of the Ailian community. It also covers proposing targeted improvement strategies, developing a walkability measurement tool, and promoting people-centered community building.

项目背景

• 评估爱联社区步行友好度
• 提出针对性改进策略
• 开发步行可行性测量工具
• 促进人本社区建设

Source: Designing a Walkability Measurement Tool for Ailian Community

The slide outlines the multi-dimensional structure of walkability, encompassing infrastructure, safety, convenience, comfort, and social perception. It describes the methodology, including a questionnaire survey with 14 valid samples, field observations for on-site assessment, and data analysis for integrated evaluation insights.

理论与方法框架

• Walkability's multi-dimensional structure: infrastructure, safety, convenience, comfort, social perception.
• Methodology: Questionnaire survey with 14 valid samples.
• Field observation to assess on-site conditions.
• Data analysis for integrated evaluation insights.

The slide outlines a measurement tool design that adopts a comprehensive scale-based assessment system to evaluate key urban dimensions, including safety, accessibility, roads, environment, services, and perception. It applies a 1-5 Likert scale for consistent scoring and combines 60% objective measures with 40% subjective ones.

Measurement Tool Design

• Adopt comprehensive scale-based assessment system
• Evaluate dimensions: safety, accessibility, roads, environment, services, perception
• Apply 1-5 Likert scale for consistent scoring
• Combine 60% objective and 40% subjective measures

The slide on data collection highlights key statistics from the sample, with 57.14% female participants forming the majority. It also shows that walking accounts for 71.43% of activities, with an average duration of 16–30 minutes per trip.

数据采集

• 57.14%: Female Participants

Majority of sample

• 71.43%: Walking Proportion

Primary activity mode

• 16–30 min: Average Walk Duration

Typical trip length

The slide highlights key challenges in the area, including poor road conditions and e-bike interference that hinder mobility. It also notes generally good nighttime lighting with local shortcomings, low access to educational and medical facilities, and inadequate infrastructure such as insufficient seating and trash bins.

Findings / 调查发现

• Road conditions and e-bike interference pose major challenges.
• Nighttime lighting is generally good but locally insufficient.
• Low accessibility to educational and medical facilities.
• Infrastructure lacks sufficient seating and trash bins.

The slide "分析与工具验证" highlights the tool's strong internal consistency, with correlations exceeding the 0.7 threshold and an overall score of 4.25 out of 5. While strengths are prominent, some shortcomings remain.

分析与工具验证

• Tool exhibits strong internal consistency.
• Correlations surpass 0.7 threshold.
• Overall score reaches 4.25 out of 5.
• Strengths prominent, yet shortcomings persist.

Source: Designing a Walkability Measurement Tool for Ailian Community

The slide titled "改进建议" (Improvement Suggestions) outlines key recommendations for urban enhancements, starting with prioritizing safety and accessibility governance through features like blind paths, barriers, and signals. It further advises supplementing infrastructure and public service gaps, optimizing spatial and temporal designs such as shading and lighting with integrated governance, and advancing public participation alongside digital governance.

改进建议

• Prioritize safety and accessibility governance (blind paths, barriers, signals)
• Supplement infrastructure and public service gaps
• Optimize spatial and temporal designs (shading, lighting, integrated governance)
• Advance public participation and digital governance

Source: Designing a Walkability Measurement Tool for Ailian Community

The Ailian community has a solid foundation for walkability. It proposes a three-step approach—"safety as the base, services to fill gaps, humanities to enhance efficiency"—aiming to create a fully friendly and all-hours safe pedestrian-oriented community, thereby enhancing overall walkability for a better living environment.

结论

爱联社区具备良好步行基础。 “安全筑基—服务填谷—人文增效”三步走。 目标：全域友好、全时安全的步行型社区。

Enhancing walkability for a better community.

Source: Designing a Walkability Measurement Tool for Ailian Community