Scrum employs sprint-based iterations with fixed roles like PO, SM, and Dev, plus ceremonies such as planning, standups, reviews, and retrospectives for predictability and iterative improvement. Kanban uses continuous flow with WIP limits, visual boards for transparency, and focuses on reducing bottlenecks for steady progress in variable workloads.
Scrum vs Kanban Comparison
| Scrum | Kanban |
|---|
| Sprint-based with fixed iterations. Defined roles (PO, SM, Dev). Ceremonies: Planning, Daily Standup, Review, Retrospective. Delivers predictability and iterative improvement through time-boxed cycles. | Continuous flow without sprints. WIP limits to optimize efficiency. Visual boards for transparency. Focuses on reducing bottlenecks and steady progress in variable workloads. |
Source: Agile Enablement Overview
Speaker Notes
Discuss scenarios for each model: Scrum for teams needing structure and predictability; Kanban for ongoing work with variable flow. Recommend hybrid approach—use Scrum for new development sprints and Kanban for maintenance/support—to leverage strengths of both for maximum flexibility and efficiency.