Beautified Multi-Modal Sentiment Analysis PPT

Generated from prompt:

Beautify the PowerPoint presentation titled 'Multi-Modal Sentiment Analysis — A Capstone Project for MCA'. Apply a professional academic theme (blue and white, clean minimal). Maintain all sections: Introduction, Problem Statement, Objectives, Dataset Details, Methodology, Comparative Analysis, Experimental Results, Conclusion, and Future Work. Use modern sans-serif fonts, consistent layouts, soft gradients, and academic icons. Simplify text-heavy slides into concise bullet points and add visuals where appropriate (e.g., architecture diagrams, fusion methods).

Professional redesign of MCA capstone PPT on multi-modal sentiment analysis. Applied blue-white academic theme, modern fonts, gradients, icons, visuals (diagrams, fusion methods), and concise bullets

December 23, 20258 slides
Slide 1 of 8

Slide 1 - Multi-Modal Sentiment Analysis

This title slide introduces "Multi-Modal Sentiment Analysis," a Capstone Project for MCA. It explores the fusion of text, audio, and visual data for advanced sentiment detection.

Multi-Modal Sentiment Analysis

A Capstone Project for MCA

Exploring Text, Audio, and Visual Fusion for Advanced Sentiment Detection

Source: Capstone Project for MCA

Speaker Notes
Opening slide for academic presentation on multi-modal sentiment analysis capstone.
Slide 1 - Multi-Modal Sentiment Analysis
Slide 2 of 8

Slide 2 - Presentation Agenda

The presentation agenda outlines four main sections: Introduction & Problem Statement on sentiment analysis challenges in multi-modal data, Objectives & Methodology covering project goals, datasets, and fusion methods. It continues with Results & Comparative Analysis of experimental outcomes and performance insights, followed by Conclusion & Future Work summarizing findings and research directions.

Presentation Agenda

  1. Introduction & Problem Statement
  2. Overview of sentiment analysis challenges in multi-modal data.

  3. Objectives & Methodology
  4. Project goals, dataset details, and proposed fusion methods.

  5. Results & Comparative Analysis
  6. Experimental outcomes, comparisons, and key performance insights.

  7. Conclusion & Future Work

Summary of findings and directions for further research. Source: Multi-Modal Sentiment Analysis — A Capstone Project for MCA

Speaker Notes
Outline the key sections to guide the audience through the presentation structure. Emphasize the flow from problem to results and future directions.
Slide 2 - Presentation Agenda
Slide 3 of 8

Slide 3 - Multi-Modal Sentiment Analysis — A Capstone Project for MCA

This section header slide introduces the "Introduction & Problem Statement" (Section 01) of the Multi-Modal Sentiment Analysis capstone project for MCA. It highlights the subtitle on challenges in fusing text, audio, and video for accurate emotion detection.

Multi-Modal Sentiment Analysis — A Capstone Project for MCA

01

Introduction & Problem Statement

Challenges in Text, Audio, and Video Fusion for Accurate Emotion Detection

Source: Introduction & Problem Statement

Speaker Notes
Overview of multi-modal sentiment analysis challenges in text, audio, video fusion for accurate emotion detection. Beautify with professional academic theme (blue and white, clean minimal). Use modern sans-serif fonts, consistent layouts, soft gradients, academic icons. Simplify text to concise bullets, add visuals.
Slide 3 - Multi-Modal Sentiment Analysis — A Capstone Project for MCA
Slide 4 of 8

Slide 4 - Objectives

The slide outlines objectives for developing a multi-modal sentiment analysis model that fuses text, audio, and visual features. It aims to achieve superior accuracy over unimodal baselines and evaluate performance on benchmark datasets.

Objectives

  • Develop multi-modal sentiment analysis model
  • Fuse text, audio, and visual features
  • Achieve superior accuracy over unimodal baselines
  • Evaluate performance on benchmark datasets

Source: Multi-Modal Sentiment Analysis — A Capstone Project for MCA

Slide 4 - Objectives
Slide 5 of 8

Slide 5 - Dataset Details

The slide details multi-modal datasets CMU-MOSEI and IEMOCAP, each with over 1000 samples including text, audio, and video. These datasets feature positive/neutral/negative sentiment labels and are preprocessed for feature extraction.

Dataset Details

  • Multi-modal datasets: CMU-MOSEI, IEMOCAP
  • 1000+ samples with text, audio, video
  • Labels: positive/neutral/negative sentiment
  • Preprocessed for feature extraction

Source: Multi-modal datasets for sentiment analysis

Speaker Notes
CMU-MOSEI and IEMOCAP provide over 1000 multi-modal samples. Preprocessed for text, audio, video features. Labeled as positive, neutral, negative sentiments.
Slide 5 - Dataset Details
Slide 6 of 8

Slide 6 - Methodology

The methodology workflow processes text with BERT for 768-dim contextual embeddings, audio with MFCC + VGGish for spectral and learned features, and video with ResNet-50 for 2048-dim frame-level spatial features. It then applies early/late fusion via concatenation or decision-level methods, followed by LSTM for temporal modeling and sentiment classification output.

Methodology

Source: Multi-Modal Sentiment Analysis — A Capstone Project for MCA

Speaker Notes
The methodology employs a multi-modal pipeline processing text via BERT embeddings, audio features extracted using MFCC and VGGish, and video frames analyzed with ResNet. Features are fused using early/late fusion techniques before classification with an LSTM model, outputting sentiment predictions. Academic icons and soft blue gradients enhance visualization.
Slide 6 - Methodology
Slide 7 of 8

Slide 7 - Comparative Analysis

The slide presents a comparative analysis table of model performances, with metrics for Accuracy and F1-Score. The multi-modal "Ours" model leads with 85% accuracy and 0.83 F1-Score, outperforming Unimodal Text (72%, 0.70) and Audio-Only (65%, 0.63).

Comparative Analysis

ModelAccuracyF1-Score
Unimodal Text72%0.70
Audio-Only65%0.63
Ours (Multi)85%0.83

Source: Multi-Modal Sentiment Analysis — A Capstone Project for MCA

Slide 7 - Comparative Analysis
Slide 8 of 8

Slide 8 - Experimental Results

The slide presents experimental results with 85% accuracy (+13% over baseline) and an F1 score of 0.83 (+15% gain from unimodal models). It also highlights a +13% accuracy gain relative to state-of-the-art and +15% F1 improvement from multi-modal fusion.

Experimental Results

  • 85%: Accuracy
  • +13% improvement over baseline

  • 0.83: F1 Score
  • +15% gain from unimodal models

  • +13%: Accuracy Gain
  • Relative to state-of-the-art

  • +15%: F1 Improvement

Multi-modal fusion benefit Source: Multi-Modal Sentiment Analysis Capstone

Slide 8 - Experimental Results

Discover More Presentations

Explore thousands of AI-generated presentations for inspiration

Browse Presentations
Powered by AI

Create Your Own Presentation

Generate professional presentations in seconds with Karaf's AI. Customize this presentation or start from scratch.

Create New Presentation

Powered by Karaf.ai — AI-Powered Presentation Generator