Strategic Industry Prioritisation Framework

Generated from prompt:

Enhance the existing presentation titled 'Prioritising industries for industrial policy' by improving slide design, flow, and content clarity. The presentation covers: 1. Problem Statement: Limited resources mean industry prioritisation is necessary; current processes are arbitrary. 2. Why Prioritise Industries: Need to address structural challenges at different economic levels. 3. Conflicting Aims: Diverging objectives in industrial policy hinder alignment. 4. Challenges: Employment, growth, mining dependency, and a weak technological base. 5. Trade-offs: Balancing productivity, employment, equity, and growth. 6. Data Analysis: Existing dtic priorities are slow-growing and small in GDP/employment share. 7. Methodology: Use of SIC codes, value chain perspective, qualitative and quantitative data. 8. Three-Phase Process: Initial prioritisation, final prioritisation, and implementation. 9. Strategic Options: - Option 1: Keep current dtic priorities - Option 2: Maximise employment/self-employment - Option 3: Maximise GDP growth 10. Key Findings: Prioritisation requires cross-government consensus, rigorous appraisal, and change management. Enhance slide visuals with better layouts, use icons and diagrams where helpful (e.g., funnel for prioritisation process), clearer titles, and emphasis on core insights for each section. Use a clean and professional style with subtle colour accents. Generate an updated version of the presentation with improved formatting and design that aligns with modern policy or development presentations. The result should be suitable for a high-level government or stakeholder audience.

Outlines why and how to prioritize industries for industrial policy amid limited resources, addressing challenges, trade-offs, and conflicting aims via data analysis, SIC-based methodology, three-phas

December 9, 202511 slides
Slide 1 of 11

Slide 1 - Prioritising Industries for Industrial Policy

This title slide is titled "Prioritising Industries for Industrial Policy." Its subtitle describes a "Strategic Framework for Aligning Resources with Economic Priorities."

Prioritising Industries

for Industrial Policy

Strategic Framework for Aligning Resources with Economic Priorities

Source: Enhanced dtic Presentation

Speaker Notes
Title slide for high-level government and stakeholder audience. Emphasise clarity and professionalism.
Slide 1 - Prioritising Industries for Industrial Policy
Slide 2 of 11

Slide 2 - Presentation Agenda

This agenda slide outlines a presentation on industry prioritization amid limited resources and mining dependency. It covers the problem and rationale, challenges and trade-offs, data analysis methodology, strategic process options, and key findings.

Presentation Agenda

  1. Problem & Prioritisation Rationale
  2. Limited resources demand prioritising industries over arbitrary processes.

  3. Challenges and Trade-offs
  4. Balancing employment, growth, equity amid mining dependency.

  5. Data Analysis & Methodology
  6. SIC codes, value chains, qual/quant data for analysis.

  7. Process & Strategic Options
  8. Three-phase approach with GDP, employment maximisation choices.

  9. Key Findings

Consensus, rigorous appraisal, change management required. Source: Prioritising industries for industrial policy

Speaker Notes
High-level overview of presentation structure to guide audience through key sections.
Slide 2 - Presentation Agenda
Slide 3 of 11

Slide 3 - Problem Statement

Limited resources demand strategic industry prioritization, but current processes are arbitrary and inefficient. A structured approach is needed to maximize impact.

Problem Statement

  • Limited resources necessitate strategic industry prioritisation
  • Current processes are arbitrary and inefficient
  • Structured approach required for maximum impact

Source: Presentation Context

Speaker Notes
Highlight the urgency: limited fiscal and administrative resources demand prioritisation; current ad-hoc methods lead to suboptimal outcomes; propose a rigorous, structured framework for greater policy impact.
Slide 3 - Problem Statement
Slide 4 of 11

Slide 4 - Why Prioritise Industries?

Prioritizing industries addresses structural challenges at macro, meso, and micro levels while aligning policies with economic realities. It also enables targeted resource allocation and overcomes arbitrary prioritization processes.

Why Prioritise Industries?

  • Addresses structural challenges at macro, meso, and micro levels
  • Aligns policy with economic realities
  • Enables targeted resource allocation
  • Overcomes arbitrary prioritisation processes
Slide 4 - Why Prioritise Industries?
Slide 5 of 11

Slide 5 - Key Challenges

The slide outlines key challenges with a 32.9% unemployment rate (youth over 60%) and 1.1% GDP growth well below the global average. It also highlights an 8% mining share in GDP amid declining over-reliance and a weak 1.2% R&D as GDP.

Key Challenges

  • 32.9%: Unemployment Rate
  • Youth exceeds 60%

  • 1.1%: GDP Growth
  • Well below global average

  • 8%: Mining GDP Share
  • Declining over-reliance

  • 1.2%: R&D as GDP

Weak technological base Source: Stats SA, World Bank, 2023

Speaker Notes
Highlight structural vulnerabilities driving the need for prioritisation: high unemployment, slow growth, mining dependency, and weak tech base.
Slide 5 - Key Challenges
Slide 6 of 11

Slide 6 - Conflicting Aims & Trade-offs

Industrial policy grapples with diverging objectives, as rapid growth conflicts with equity and employment goals, impeding strategic alignment. It emphasizes balancing trade-offs among productivity, employment, equity, and sustainable growth, symbolized by scales.

Conflicting Aims & Trade-offs

Diverging ObjectivesBalancing Trade-offs
Industrial policy faces conflicting aims: rapid growth often clashes with equity and employment goals, hindering strategic alignment and effective prioritisation.Key priorities to weigh: productivity, employment, equity, and sustainable growth. ⚖️ Scales icon represents inevitable trade-offs in resource allocation.

Source: Prioritising industries for industrial policy

Speaker Notes
Emphasize diverging goals like growth vs. equity using scales icon on right to illustrate trade-offs. Stress need for alignment.
Slide 6 - Conflicting Aims & Trade-offs
Slide 7 of 11

Slide 7 - Data Analysis: Current dtic Priorities

The slide "Data Analysis: Current DTIC Priorities" presents key stats on economic performance. It shows a 4.1% GDP share with minimal contribution, 1.2% annual growth rate for slow-growing sectors, and 2.8% employment share with low job creation impact.

Data Analysis: Current dtic Priorities

  • 4.1%: GDP Share
  • Minimal economic contribution

  • 1.2%: Annual Growth Rate
  • Slow-growing sectors

  • 2.8%: Employment Share

Low job creation impact Source: Stats SA & dtic Reports

Speaker Notes
Highlight how current priorities underperform in growth, GDP, and employment—key rationale for reprioritisation.
Slide 7 - Data Analysis: Current dtic Priorities
Slide 8 of 11

Slide 8 - Methodology

The Methodology slide uses SIC codes for industry classification and adopts a value chain perspective. It also integrates qualitative and quantitative data.

Methodology

  • SIC codes for industry classification
  • Value chain perspective
  • Integration of qualitative & quantitative data
Slide 8 - Methodology
Slide 9 of 11

Slide 9 - Three-Phase Process

The slide outlines a three-phase workflow for industry prioritization: Initial Prioritisation using quantitative data (e.g., SIC codes, GDP shares) by the dtic Analysis Team; Final Prioritisation refining selections qualitatively (e.g., consultations, trade-offs) by the Inter-departmental Committee; and Implementation (e.g., action plans, monitoring) by the Implementation Unit.

Three-Phase Process

{ "headers": [ "Phase", "Description", "Key Activities", "Owner" ], "rows": [ [ "1: Initial Prioritisation", "Narrow down industries using quantitative data", "• SIC codes analysis

  • GDP/employment share
  • Value chain mapping

(Funnel icon)", "dtic Analysis Team" ], [ "2: Final Prioritisation", "Refine selection with qualitative inputs", "• Cross-government consultation

  • Address trade-offs (productivity, employment, equity)
  • Consensus building",
  • "Inter-departmental Committee" ], [ "3: Implementation", "Execute and monitor priorities", "• Develop action plans

  • Rigorous appraisal
  • Change management & tracking",

"Implementation Unit" ] ] }

Slide 9 - Three-Phase Process
Slide 10 of 11

Slide 10 - Strategic Options

The "Strategic Options" slide presents a feature grid contrasting pros (✅) and cons (❌) of economic strategies. It highlights policy continuity and job creation as advantages, offset by limited impact and productivity trade-offs, alongside GDP acceleration tempered by jobless growth risks.

Strategic Options

{ "features": [ { "icon": "✅", "heading": "Policy Continuity", "description": "Builds on established priorities with minimal disruption to initiatives." }, { "icon": "❌", "heading": "Limited Impact", "description": "Slow-growing sectors with small GDP and employment contributions." }, { "icon": "✅", "heading": "Job Creation Focus", "description": "Prioritises industries maximising employment and self-employment opportunities." }, { "icon": "❌", "heading": "Productivity Trade-off", "description": "Favours labour-intensive over high-productivity growth sectors." }, { "icon": "✅", "heading": "GDP Acceleration", "description": "Targets high-growth industries to drive overall economic expansion." }, { "icon": "❌", "heading": "Jobless Growth Risk", "description": "Rapid GDP gains may not yield broad employment benefits." } ] }

Slide 10 - Strategic Options
Slide 11 of 11

Slide 11 - Key Findings

The slide's key findings emphasize that effective industrial policy requires cross-government consensus, rigorous appraisal, and strong change management, with prioritization driven by consensus for success. It closes with a call to unite for impact and align cross-government efforts now.

Key Findings

• Requires cross-government consensus

  • Rigorous appraisal needed
  • Strong change management essential

Closing: Unite for impact. Call to action: Align cross-government efforts now for effective industrial policy! ✅

Prioritisation: Consensus drives success

Source: Prioritising industries for industrial policy

Speaker Notes
Emphasise urgency: recap consensus, appraisal, and change management. End with strong CTA to align stakeholders.
Slide 11 - Key Findings

Discover More Presentations

Explore thousands of AI-generated presentations for inspiration

Browse Presentations
Powered by AI

Create Your Own Presentation

Generate professional presentations in seconds with Karaf's AI. Customize this presentation or start from scratch.

Create New Presentation

Powered by Karaf.ai — AI-Powered Presentation Generator