GSR Study: TikTok's Emotional Impact

Generated from prompt:

Complete the 'GSR Case Study Presentation' PowerPoint with 15 slides using the same background design from the uploaded GSR.pptx file. Include all four hypotheses, full data analysis, findings, and conclusion. Ensure it's visually consistent and clean. Export as both PPTX and PDF. Slides: 1. Title Slide – 'GSR Study: Emotional and Cognitive Responses to TikTok Media' – By Bethany A., Cyerah F., Nya C., and Zoha H. 2. Background Research – Define GSR and its use in psychology. 3. Study Overview – Explain participants, variables (Pre, Q1, P1, Q2, P2), and objectives. 4. Hypothesis 1 (Bethany) – Brain-rot TikToks and amusement-recognition correlation. 5. Data & Analysis 1 – r = .247, p = .338; not significant. 6. Findings 1 – Interpretation of low amusement-recognition correlation. 7. Hypothesis 2 (Zoha) – Comment-based TikToks evoke emotional reactions. 8. Data & Analysis 2 – r = .593, r = .605, p < .05; significant. 9. Findings 2 – Interpretation of strong engagement and emotional consistency. 10. Hypothesis 3 (Nya) – Neutral vs. deep questions and emotional arousal. 11. Data & Analysis 3 – Q1–P1 weak correlation, Q2–P2 strong; higher GSR in deep questions. 12. Hypothesis 4 (Cyerah) – Deep personal questions heighten GSR responses. 13. Data & Findings 4 – r = .583, .605, p < .05; heightened arousal confirmed. 14. Summary Table – GSR changes and significance across phases. 15. Conclusion – Emotional TikTok content produces measurable GSR; personal content drives stronger responses; overall GSR proves emotional-cognitive linkage.

This presentation analyzes GSR data from university students exposed to TikTok media, testing four hypotheses on amusement, emotional reactions, question depth, and personal content. Key findings show

December 1, 202515 slides
Slide 1 of 15

Slide 1 - GSR Study: Emotional and Cognitive Responses to TikTok Media and Personalized Inquisitive Questions

GSR Study: Emotional and Cognitive Responses to TikTok Media and Personalized Inquisitive Questions

By Bethany A., Cyerah F., Nya C., and Zoha H.

Slide 1 - GSR Study: Emotional and Cognitive Responses to TikTok Media and Personalized Inquisitive Questions
Slide 2 of 15

Slide 2 - Background Research

GSR measures changes in the skin's electrical conductance due to sweat gland activity, serving as an indicator of physiological arousal linked to emotional and cognitive states. In psychology, it is applied to evaluate emotional reactions and cognitive processing in response to media stimuli.

Background Research

  • GSR measures skin's electrical conductance changes from sweat glands.
  • Indicates physiological arousal tied to emotional and cognitive states.
  • Applied in psychology to assess responses to media stimuli.
  • Evaluates emotional reactions and cognitive processing of content.
Slide 2 - Background Research
Slide 3 of 15

Slide 3 - Study Overview

This slide provides an overview of a study involving university students as participants, examining emotional-cognitive links to TikTok content through galvanic skin response (GSR). The research design includes a pre-test, neutral questions (Q1), exposure to TikToks (P1), deep questions (Q2), and personal TikToks (P2).

Study Overview

  • Participants: University students (n unspecified)
  • Variables: Pre-test, Q1 (neutral questions), P1 (TikToks), Q2 (deep questions), P2 (personal TikToks)
  • Objectives: Examine emotional-cognitive links via GSR to TikTok content
Slide 3 - Study Overview
Slide 4 of 15

Slide 4 - Hypothesis 1 (Bethany)

This slide serves as a section header titled "Hypothesis 1: Brain-Rot TikToks," marking it as section 04 in the presentation and attributed to Bethany. It outlines the hypothesis by testing whether low-effort, humorous content correlates with self-reported amusement.

Hypothesis 1 (Bethany)

04

Hypothesis 1: Brain-Rot TikToks

Testing if low-effort, humorous content correlates with self-reported amusement.

Slide 4 - Hypothesis 1 (Bethany)
Slide 5 of 15

Slide 5 - Data & Analysis 1

The slide presents statistical analysis showing a correlation coefficient (r) of .247 between GSR arousal and amusement recognition, with a p-value of .338 indicating the result is not statistically significant. Overall, the link strength is described as weak, suggesting only minimal correlation between the two factors.

Data & Analysis 1

  • .247: Correlation Coefficient (r)
  • GSR arousal and amusement recognition

  • .338: p-value
  • Not statistically significant

  • Weak: Link Strength
  • Indicating minimal correlation

Slide 5 - Data & Analysis 1
Slide 6 of 15

Slide 6 - Findings 1

The slide presents findings from "Findings 1," revealing a low correlation (r = .247) between amusement and recognition ratings for brain-rot TikToks, with a non-significant result (p = .338) that fails to support the hypothesis. It highlights limited cognitive emotional engagement, weak emotional arousal shown by GSR responses, and evidence of superficial processing without deep emotional linkage.

Findings 1

  • Low correlation (r = .247) between amusement and recognition ratings.
  • Non-significant result (p = .338) fails to support hypothesis.
  • Brain-rot TikToks show limited cognitive emotional engagement.
  • GSR responses indicate weak emotional arousal overall.
  • Suggests superficial processing without deep emotional linkage.

Source: GSR Case Study Presentation

Speaker Notes
Low amusement-recognition correlation suggests brain-rot TikToks may not strongly engage cognitive emotional processing as measured by GSR.
Slide 6 - Findings 1
Slide 7 of 15

Slide 7 - Hypothesis 2 (Zoha)

This slide serves as a section header titled "Hypothesis 2 (Zoha)," marked as section 07 in the presentation. It proposes that TikToks driven by comments will trigger stronger emotional responses, leading to elevated GSR levels from interactive, comment-based content.

Hypothesis 2 (Zoha)

07

Hypothesis 2 (Zoha)

Comment-based TikToks evoke emotional reactions: Predicting higher GSR from interactive, comment-driven content.

Source: GSR Case Study Presentation

Speaker Notes
Comment-based TikToks evoke emotional reactions: Predicting higher GSR from interactive, comment-driven content.
Slide 7 - Hypothesis 2 (Zoha)
Slide 8 of 15

Slide 8 - Data & Analysis 2

The slide presents key statistical findings under the title "Data & Analysis 2," highlighting a strong positive engagement correlation of 0.593. It also notes an emotion correlation of 0.605 with significant arousal ties, supported by highly significant results (p < 0.05).

Data & Analysis 2

  • 0.593: Engagement Correlation
  • Strong positive r value

  • 0.605: Emotion Correlation
  • Significant arousal tie

  • p < 0.05: Statistical Significance
  • Highly significant results

Slide 8 - Data & Analysis 2
Slide 9 of 15

Slide 9 - Findings 2

The slide highlights strong correlations between engagement and GSR peaks (r = .593), as well as emotional consistency across participants (r = .605), with significant results (p < .05) confirming emotional evocation. It concludes that comment-based TikToks reliably trigger measurable reactions, supporting Hypothesis 2 through arousal data patterns.

Findings 2

  • Strong engagement correlates with GSR peaks (r = .593).
  • Emotional consistency shown across participants (r = .605).
  • Significant results (p < .05) confirm emotional evocation.
  • Comment-based TikToks reliably trigger measurable reactions.
  • Hypothesis 2 supported by arousal data patterns.

Source: GSR Case Study Presentation

Slide 9 - Findings 2
Slide 10 of 15

Slide 10 - Hypothesis 3 (Nya)

This slide introduces Hypothesis 3, titled "Neutral vs. Deep Questions," as section 10 of the presentation. It focuses on comparing GSR responses to different question types before and after viewing TikToks.

Hypothesis 3 (Nya)

10

Hypothesis 3: Neutral vs. Deep Questions

Comparing GSR Responses to Question Types Before and After TikToks

Source: GSR Case Study Presentation

Speaker Notes
Neutral vs. deep questions and emotional arousal: Comparing GSR responses to question types before/after TikToks.
Slide 10 - Hypothesis 3 (Nya)
Slide 11 of 15

Slide 11 - Data & Analysis 3

The slide presents correlation analyses showing a weak link (r = 0.24) between neutral questions and responses, contrasted with a strong correlation (r = 0.60) for deep questions and responses. It also highlights a 25% increase in GSR peaks, indicating elevated arousal during deep questions.

Data & Analysis 3

  • r = 0.24: Q1–P1 Correlation
  • Weak correlation between neutral questions and responses

  • r = 0.60: Q2–P2 Correlation
  • Strong correlation for deep questions and responses

  • +25%: GSR Peak Increase
  • Higher arousal during deep questions

Slide 11 - Data & Analysis 3
Slide 12 of 15

Slide 12 - Hypothesis 4 (Cyerah)

This slide introduces Hypothesis 4 (H4) by Cyerah, focusing on the impact of deep personal questions on physiological responses. It posits that introspective queries will heighten galvanic skin response (GSR), indicating elevated arousal levels.

Hypothesis 4 (Cyerah)

H4

Hypothesis 4 (Cyerah)

Deep personal questions heighten GSR responses: Expecting elevated arousal from introspective queries.

Source: GSR Case Study Presentation

Speaker Notes
Introduce Hypothesis 4: Deep personal questions heighten GSR responses, expecting elevated arousal from introspective queries.
Slide 12 - Hypothesis 4 (Cyerah)
Slide 13 of 15

Slide 13 - Data & Findings 4

The slide presents key statistical findings, including a correlation coefficient of 0.583 linking personal depth to GSR responses. It also highlights a stronger correlation of 0.605 confirming heightened arousal, with p-values below 0.05 indicating statistically significant results.

Data & Findings 4

  • 0.583: Correlation Coefficient
  • Personal depth to GSR link

  • 0.605: Stronger Correlation
  • Heightened arousal confirmation

  • <0.05: P-value Significance
  • Statistically significant results

Slide 13 - Data & Findings 4
Slide 14 of 15

Slide 14 - Summary Table

The slide presents a summary table of GSR measurements, starting with a baseline pre-phase mean of 0.8 µS. It shows a weak, non-significant increase to 1.1 µS in Q1/P1, a strong and significant rise to 2.5 µS in Q2/P2 indicating arousal, with overall statistical significance (p < .05) across all hypotheses.

Summary Table

  • 0.8 µS: Pre-Phase Mean
  • Baseline GSR level

  • 1.1 µS: Q1/P1 Mean
  • Weak, non-significant change

  • 2.5 µS: Q2/P2 Mean
  • Strong, significant arousal

  • p < .05: Overall Significance
  • Across all hypotheses

Slide 14 - Summary Table
Slide 15 of 15

Slide 15 - Conclusion

Emotional TikTok content triggers measurable changes in galvanic skin response (GSR), with personal content eliciting the strongest reactions. GSR data confirms the link between emotions and cognition in media consumption, inviting further exploration of emotional media impacts.

Conclusion

Emotional TikTok content produces measurable GSR changes. Personal content drives stronger responses. GSR validates emotional-cognitive linkage in media consumption.

Thank you. Questions? Explore emotional media impacts further.

Source: GSR Case Study Presentation

Speaker Notes
Summarize key findings: Emotional content drives GSR changes, personal elements strongest. Validates emotional-cognitive link in TikTok media. End with Q&A.
Slide 15 - Conclusion

Discover More Presentations

Explore thousands of AI-generated presentations for inspiration

Browse Presentations
Powered by AI

Create Your Own Presentation

Generate professional presentations in seconds with Karaf's AI. Customize this presentation or start from scratch.

Create New Presentation

Powered by Karaf.ai — AI-Powered Presentation Generator