Quantization Techniques for Efficient LLMs (38 chars)

Generated from prompt:

Title: Quantization and Compression Techniques for Efficient Large Language Models Slide 1: Introduction - The rise of large language models (LLMs) and computational challenges. - Example: A 70B parameter model needs 140GB in FP16 precision. - Motivation: Efficiency without sacrificing accuracy. Notes: In this talk, we’ll explore how mathematical quantization principles and modern algorithmic advances combine to make LLMs more efficient, from theory to system deployment. --- Slide 2: Mathematical Foundations of Quantization - Quantization as affine mapping: x̂ = s·round(x/s + z) - Statistical estimation view: bias–variance trade-off. - Trade-off: compression vs accuracy. Notes: Quantization reduces precision by mapping continuous values to discrete ones. Mathematically, it’s an affine transformation balancing bias and variance, much like classical statistical estimators. --- Slide 3: QSGD – Communication-Efficient SGD (Dan Alistarh) - Idea: Quantize gradients to reduce communication in distributed training. - Method: Randomized quantization preserves unbiasedness. - Result: Convergence with provable error bounds. Notes: QSGD introduced the idea that quantization doesn’t have to break convergence. By using stochastic rounding, gradient updates remain unbiased, which was a foundational insight for later quantization work. --- Slide 4: Post-Training Quantization – GPTQ (Elias Frantar) - Focus: Quantize trained models without retraining. - Core idea: Solve local least-squares optimization per layer. - Goal: Minimize quantization error layer-wise. Notes: GPTQ is elegant — it approximates optimal quantization mathematically by minimizing the reconstruction error after training, giving near full-precision accuracy without huge compute costs. --- Slide 5: SmoothQuant – Activation and Weight Balancing (Guangxuan Xiao) - Problem: Activation outliers hurt quantization. - Solution: Scale activations and weights jointly before quantization. - Effect: Smoother activation distribution → smaller quantization loss. Notes: SmoothQuant uses a simple linear scaling trick — shift the dynamic range between activations and weights to “smooth” the signal. Mathematically, it’s just rescaling, but it makes quantization far more stable. --- Slide 6: AWQ – Activation-Aware Weight Quantization (Ji Lin) - Key idea: Use activation statistics to guide weight quantization. - Model-aware quantization → better layer sensitivity handling. - Works well for LLMs like OPT, LLaMA. Notes: AWQ builds on SmoothQuant by explicitly modeling activation distributions. It’s more data-aware and gives strong results even at 4-bit precision — bridging math modeling and hardware implementation. --- Slide 7: QLoRA – Finetuning Quantized Models (Tim Dettmers) - Motivation: Finetune 4-bit models without losing accuracy. - Method: Use Low-Rank Adapters (LoRA) on frozen quantized weights. - Result: Efficient finetuning with minimal memory footprint. Notes: QLoRA combines low-rank updates with quantized base models. It shows how quantization integrates with optimization — fine-tuning efficiently while retaining mathematical guarantees of stability. --- Slide 8: System-Level Optimization - Hardware-aware quantization (NVIDIA TensorRT, Intel AMX). - Mixed precision computation. - Communication-efficient distributed training. Notes: Once the math and algorithms are ready, the system layer ensures they run efficiently on GPUs or distributed nodes. Quantization-aware scheduling and memory mapping become key here. --- Slide 9: Mathematical Throughline - Common structure: affine mappings, scaling, error minimization. - Core metrics: Mean Squared Error, KL divergence, quantization noise. - Mathematics unifies algorithms across levels. Notes: Every method can be viewed as minimizing some quantization error under constraints — from gradient compression to activation smoothing. Mathematics connects theory, algorithms, and implementation. --- Slide 10: Summary and Outlook - Quantization enables efficient and accessible LLM deployment. - Trend: Combining math rigor + engineering pragmatism. - Future: Adaptive quantization, error-bounded mixed precision. Notes: Quantization has evolved from a mathematical curiosity to a core enabler of modern AI systems. The next step is adaptive quantization — where models learn their own precision dynamically. --- Slide 11: References - Alistarh et al., QSGD (NeurIPS 2017) - Frantar et al., GPTQ (ICLR 2023) - Xiao et al., SmoothQuant (NeurIPS 2022) - Lin et al., AWQ (arXiv 2023) - Dettmers et al., QLoRA (ICML 2023) Notes: These works together define the landscape of quantization and compression for LLMs — a blend of deep math, algorithm design, and hardware efficiency.

Overview of quantization methods for LLMs, from mathematical foundations (QSGD, affine mappings) to post-training (GPTQ, SmoothQuant, AWQ), finetuning (QLoRA), system optimizations, and future trends—

December 13, 202512 slides
Slide 1 of 12

Slide 1 - Quantization and Compression Techniques for Efficient Large Language Models

This title slide is titled "Quantization and Compression Techniques for Efficient Large Language Models." Its subtitle explores mathematical quantization principles and algorithmic advances for efficient LLMs, from theory to deployment.

Quantization and Compression Techniques for Efficient Large Language Models

Exploring mathematical quantization principles and algorithmic advances for efficient LLMs, from theory to deployment.

Speaker Notes
In this talk, we’ll explore how mathematical quantization principles and modern algorithmic advances combine to make LLMs more efficient, from theory to system deployment.
Slide 1 - Quantization and Compression Techniques for Efficient Large Language Models
Slide 2 of 12

Slide 2 - Introduction

This slide introduces the rise of large language models (LLMs) and their computational challenges, exemplified by a 70B parameter model requiring 140GB in FP16 precision. The core motivation is to improve efficiency without sacrificing accuracy.

Introduction

  • Rise of large language models (LLMs) and computational challenges
  • 70B parameter model requires 140GB in FP16 precision
  • Motivation: Efficiency without sacrificing accuracy

Source: Quantization and Compression Techniques for Efficient Large Language Models

Speaker Notes
In this talk, we’ll explore how mathematical quantization principles and modern algorithmic advances combine to make LLMs more efficient, from theory to system deployment.
Slide 2 - Introduction
Slide 3 of 12

Slide 3 - Mathematical Foundations of Quantization

The slide outlines the mathematical foundations of quantization via the affine mapping formula x̂ = s · round(x/s + z), which maps continuous values to discrete levels. It highlights the statistical bias-variance trade-off, balancing compression gains against accuracy loss by minimizing error through scaling and zero-point.

Mathematical Foundations of Quantization

  • Affine mapping: x̂ = s · round(x/s + z)
  • Statistical view: bias-variance trade-off
  • Balances compression against accuracy loss
  • Maps continuous values to discrete levels
  • Minimizes quantization error via scaling and zero-point
Slide 3 - Mathematical Foundations of Quantization
Slide 4 of 12

Slide 4 - Quantization and Compression Techniques for Efficient Large Language Models

This section header slide introduces Section 03: "QSGD – Communication-Efficient SGD" within the topic of quantization and compression for efficient large language models. It highlights quantizing gradients in distributed training to maintain unbiasedness and provable convergence bounds.

Quantization and Compression Techniques for Efficient Large Language Models

03

QSGD – Communication-Efficient SGD

Quantize gradients for distributed training while preserving unbiasedness with provable convergence bounds.

Source: Dan Alistarh et al. (NeurIPS 2017)

Speaker Notes
QSGD introduced the idea that quantization doesn’t have to break convergence. By using stochastic rounding, gradient updates remain unbiased, which was a foundational insight for later quantization work.
Slide 4 - Quantization and Compression Techniques for Efficient Large Language Models
Slide 5 of 12

Slide 5 - Post-Training Quantization – GPTQ

GPTQ enables post-training quantization of models without retraining. It uses layer-wise least-squares optimization to minimize per-layer quantization error, achieving near full-precision accuracy.

Post-Training Quantization – GPTQ

  • Quantizes trained models without retraining.
  • Uses layer-wise least-squares optimization.
  • Minimizes quantization error per layer.
  • Achieves near full-precision accuracy.

Source: Frantar et al., ICLR 2023

Speaker Notes
GPTQ is elegant — it approximates optimal quantization mathematically by minimizing the reconstruction error after training, giving near full-precision accuracy without huge compute costs.
Slide 5 - Post-Training Quantization – GPTQ
Slide 6 of 12

Slide 6 - SmoothQuant – Activation and Weight Balancing

SmoothQuant tackles activation outliers that degrade quantization performance by jointly scaling activations and weights before quantization. This smooths activation distributions for stability, reduces quantization loss via simple rescaling, and enables effective low-bit LLM deployment.

SmoothQuant – Activation and Weight Balancing

  • Activation outliers degrade quantization performance
  • Jointly scale activations and weights pre-quantization
  • Smooths activation distributions for stability
  • Reduces quantization loss via simple rescaling
  • Enables effective low-bit LLM deployment

Source: Xiao et al., SmoothQuant (NeurIPS 2022)

Speaker Notes
SmoothQuant uses a simple linear scaling trick — shift the dynamic range between activations and weights to “smooth” the signal. Mathematically, it’s just rescaling, but it makes quantization far more stable.
Slide 6 - SmoothQuant – Activation and Weight Balancing
Slide 7 of 12

Slide 7 - AWQ – Activation-Aware Weight Quantization

AWQ (Activation-Aware Weight Quantization) leverages activation statistics, layer sensitivity, and real LLM distributions for precise, model-aware 4-bit weight quantization with minimal accuracy loss. It delivers strong performance on OPT and LLaMA models while enhancing SmoothQuant for superior low-bit results.

AWQ – Activation-Aware Weight Quantization

{ "features": [ { "icon": "📊", "heading": "Activation Stats Guide", "description": "Leverages activation statistics to inform precise weight quantization." }, { "icon": "🎯", "heading": "Layer Sensitivity Aware", "description": "Handles varying layer importance for minimal accuracy loss." }, { "icon": "⚡", "heading": "4-Bit Excellence", "description": "Delivers strong performance on OPT and LLaMA models." }, { "icon": "🧠", "heading": "Model-Aware Approach", "description": "Tailors quantization using real LLM activation distributions." }, { "icon": "🔄", "heading": "Enhances SmoothQuant", "description": "Builds on smoothing for superior low-bit quantization." } ] }

Source: Lin et al., AWQ (arXiv 2023)

Speaker Notes
AWQ builds on SmoothQuant by explicitly modeling activation distributions. It’s more data-aware and gives strong results even at 4-bit precision — bridging math modeling and hardware implementation.
Slide 7 - AWQ – Activation-Aware Weight Quantization
Slide 8 of 12

Slide 8 - QLoRA – Finetuning Quantized Models

QLoRA finetunes 4-bit quantized models using LoRA adapters while freezing weights to save memory. It delivers high accuracy with low resources, enabling efficient adaptation of large LLMs.

QLoRA – Finetuning Quantized Models

  • Finetunes 4-bit models using LoRA adapters.
  • Freezes quantized weights to save memory.
  • Achieves high accuracy with low resources.
  • Enables efficient adaptation of large LLMs.

Source: Tim Dettmers et al., ICML 2023

Speaker Notes
QLoRA combines low-rank updates with quantized base models. It shows how quantization integrates with optimization — fine-tuning efficiently while retaining mathematical guarantees of stability.
Slide 8 - QLoRA – Finetuning Quantized Models
Slide 9 of 12

Slide 9 - System-Level Optimization

The slide on System-Level Optimization highlights hardware acceleration using NVIDIA TensorRT and Intel AMX for hardware-aware quantization and mixed precision (FP16/INT8), reducing memory/compute costs while preserving accuracy for fast LLM inference. It also covers distributed training efficiency via quantized gradients (e.g., QSGD), which cut communication overhead to enable scalable GPU cluster training with minimal bandwidth and faster convergence.

System-Level Optimization

Hardware AccelerationDistributed Training Efficiency
NVIDIA TensorRT and Intel AMX enable hardware-aware quantization. Mixed precision (FP16/INT8) cuts memory and compute costs while preserving accuracy for fast LLM inference.Quantized gradients (e.g., QSGD) reduce communication overhead in multi-node setups. Enables scalable training across GPU clusters with minimal bandwidth and faster convergence.

Source: Quantization and Compression Techniques for Efficient Large Language Models

Speaker Notes
Once the math and algorithms are ready, the system layer ensures they run efficiently on GPUs or distributed nodes. Quantization-aware scheduling and memory mapping become key here.
Slide 9 - System-Level Optimization
Slide 10 of 12

Slide 10 - Mathematical Throughline

The "Mathematical Throughline" slide outlines affine mappings as the core structure, with scaling to balance dynamic ranges. It emphasizes error minimization via MSE and KL divergence, unifying theory with implementation.

Mathematical Throughline

  • Affine mappings as core structure
  • Scaling balances dynamic ranges
  • Error minimization via MSE, KL
  • Unifies theory to implementation

Source: Quantization and Compression Techniques for Efficient Large Language Models

Speaker Notes
Every method can be viewed as minimizing some quantization error under constraints — from gradient compression to activation smoothing. Mathematics connects theory, algorithms, and implementation.
Slide 10 - Mathematical Throughline
Slide 11 of 12

Slide 11 - Summary and Outlook

This conclusion slide summarizes how quantization enables LLM deployment and highlights key math and engineering trends. It outlines a future of adaptive, error-bounded precision, ending with "Thank you!"

Summary and Outlook

• Quantization enables LLM deployment

  • Math + engineering trends
  • Future: Adaptive, error-bounded precision

Thank you!

Source: Quantization and Compression Techniques for Efficient Large Language Models

Speaker Notes
Quantization has evolved from a mathematical curiosity to a core enabler of modern AI systems. The next step is adaptive quantization — where models learn their own precision dynamically. Closing: Thank you! Call-to-action: Explore adaptive quantization in your projects.
Slide 11 - Summary and Outlook
Slide 12 of 12

Slide 12 - References

The "References" slide features a table listing five key papers on model quantization techniques, including their lead authors. The entries are QSGD (Alistarh, NeurIPS 2017), GPTQ (Frantar, ICLR 2023), SmoothQuant (Xiao, NeurIPS 2022), AWQ (Lin, arXiv 2023), and QLoRA (Dettmers, ICML 2023).

References

{ "headers": [ "Paper", "Venue/Year" ], "rows": [ [ "QSGD (Alistarh)", "NeurIPS 2017" ], [ "GPTQ (Frantar)", "ICLR 2023" ], [ "SmoothQuant (Xiao)", "NeurIPS 2022" ], [ "AWQ (Lin)", "arXiv 2023" ], [ "QLoRA (Dettmers)", "ICML 2023" ] ] }

Source: Quantization and Compression Techniques for Efficient Large Language Models

Speaker Notes
These works together define the landscape of quantization and compression for LLMs — a blend of deep math, algorithm design, and hardware efficiency.
Slide 12 - References

Discover More Presentations

Explore thousands of AI-generated presentations for inspiration

Browse Presentations
Powered by AI

Create Your Own Presentation

Generate professional presentations in seconds with Karaf's AI. Customize this presentation or start from scratch.

Create New Presentation

Powered by Karaf.ai — AI-Powered Presentation Generator