The title slide presents a dissertation proposal titled "Dinamika Kompleksitas Institusional dalam Paradoks Kebijakan Kedaulatan Digital," which explores the institutional complexities and paradoxes in digital sovereignty policies. It includes a subtitle introducing it as an introduction by [Nama Peneliti] on [Tanggal].

Dinamika Kompleksitas Institusional dalam Paradoks Kebijakan Kedaulatan Digital

Pengantar Proposal Disertasi Oleh: [Nama Peneliti] [Tanggal]

Source: Proposal Disertasi

The agenda slide outlines a presentation on digital policy paradoxes, starting with the background and problem formulation, which discusses the context and key issues. It continues with research objectives, benefits, and the Institutional Logics theoretical framework; hypotheses and qualitative multi-case study methodology; and concludes with an integrative thinking model and implications for adaptive digital sovereignty.

Agenda Presentasi

1. Latar Belakang dan Rumusan Masalah

Membahas konteks paradoks kebijakan digital dan permasalahan utama.

2. Tujuan, Manfaat, dan Kerangka Teori

Menjelaskan sasaran penelitian beserta landasan teori Institutional Logics.

3. Hipotesis dan Metodologi Penelitian

Merumuskan hipotesis serta pendekatan studi kasus ganda kualitatif.

4. Kerangka Pemikiran dan Kesimpulan

Menyajikan model integratif dan implikasi kedaulatan digital adaptif. Source: Proposal Disertasi: Dinamika Kompleksitas Institusional dalam Paradoks Kebijakan Kedaulatan Digital

This section header slide introduces the first topic: "Latar Belakang Masalah dan Paradoks Kebijakan Digital," which translates to the background of problems and paradoxes in digital policy. It provides a subtitle outlining the context of digital sovereignty in the globalization era, institutional challenges, and the paradox between national regulations and global data flows.

1

Latar Belakang Masalah dan Paradoks Kebijakan Digital

Konteks kedaulatan digital di era globalisasi, tantangan institusional, dan paradoks regulasi nasional vs arus data global

The slide titled "Rumusan Masalah" outlines key research problems in digital sovereignty policy amid technological globalization, highlighting the paradox of such policies in a connected world. It further examines the influence of institutional dynamics on policy implementation, along with negative impacts on national digital innovation and growth, and significant implications for national security and data protection.

Rumusan Masalah

• Paradoks kebijakan kedaulatan digital di era globalisasi teknologi.
• Pengaruh dinamika institusional terhadap implementasi kebijakan tersebut.
• Dampak negatif pada inovasi dan pertumbuhan sektor digital nasional.
• Implikasi signifikan bagi keamanan nasional dan perlindungan data.

The slide outlines the research objectives and benefits, focusing on analyzing institutional complexities in the paradox of digital sovereignty policy. It highlights theoretical contributions via the Institutional Logics framework and provides policy recommendations for an adaptive digital sovereignty model.

Tujuan dan Manfaat Penelitian

• Menganalisis kompleksitas institusional dalam paradoks kebijakan kedaulatan digital.
• Menyumbang kontribusi teori melalui kerangka Institutional Logics.
• Menyediakan rekomendasi kebijakan untuk model kedaulatan digital adaptif.

Institutional logics define the rules and norms governing organizations, serving as a framework to analyze conflicts among diverse logics. The slide applies this concept to the dynamics of modern digital organizations and understanding policy paradoxes through logic interactions.

Kerangka Teori: Institutional Logics

• Logika institusional mendefinisikan aturan dan norma organisasi.
• Kerangka untuk menganalisis konflik antar logika beragam.
• Aplikasi pada dinamika organisasi digital modern.
• Memahami paradoks kebijakan melalui interaksi logika.

Source: Greenwood et al. (2011)

The slide titled "Hipotesis Penelitian" outlines two key research hypotheses: the first posits that policy paradoxes arise from clashes in institutional logics, while the second suggests that case studies demonstrate adaptation via the hybridization of these logics. It concludes with the implication that an adaptive model can effectively address the complexities of digital sovereignty.

Hipotesis Penelitian

• Hipotesis 1: Paradoks kebijakan muncul dari benturan logika institusional.
• Hipotesis 2: Studi kasus menunjukkan adaptasi melalui hibridisasi logika.
• Implikasi: Model adaptif mengatasi kompleksitas kedaulatan digital.

This slide on Metodologi Penelitian outlines a qualitative approach to exploring complex institutional dynamics in digital sovereignty policies, emphasizing in-depth interpretation of non-numerical data to understand paradoxes and interactions. It also details a multiple case study design that compares Indonesia's digital policies with those of other countries, using methods like official document analysis and in-depth stakeholder interviews to reveal institutional complexities.

Metodologi Penelitian

Source: Proposal Disertasi: Dinamika Kompleksitas Institusional dalam Paradoks Kebijakan Kedaulatan Digital

The slide, titled "Kerangka Pemikiran," outlines a conceptual framework where institutional logics shape policy formulation. It highlights how conflicts between these logics create policy paradoxes, which an adaptive model addresses by incorporating elements of digital sovereignty.

Kerangka Pemikiran

!Image

• Institutional logics influence policy formulation
• Policy paradoxes emerge from logic conflicts
• Adaptive model integrates digital sovereignty elements

Source: Wikipedia search: institutional logics framework

An adaptive digital sovereignty model is essential to address policy paradoxes in the digital realm. The slide recommends integrating institutional logic into policymaking and calls for adopting this model to ensure sustainable digital sovereignty.

Kesimpulan: Pentingnya Model Kedaulatan Digital Adaptif

- Model adaptif diperlukan untuk mengatasi paradoks kebijakan digital.

• Rekomendasi: Integrasi logika institusional dalam pembuatan kebijakan.

Terima kasih atas perhatiannya.

Call-to-action: Adopsi model adaptif untuk kedaulatan digital berkelanjutan.

Source: Dinamika Kompleksitas Institusional dalam Paradoks Kebijakan Kedaulatan Digital