This title slide, titled "Wirtschaftliche Globalisierung – Makroperspektive" (Economic Globalization – Macro Perspective), features the main text "Der Umgang mit Globalisierungsverlierern am Beispiel Dänemarks" (Dealing with Globalization Losers: The Example of Denmark). The subtitle notes the seminar details, including name, date, and lecturer.

Der Umgang mit Globalisierungsverlierern am Beispiel Dänemarks

Seminar [Name, Datum, Dozent]

Source: Seminar [Name, Datum, Dozent]

The slide "Ausgangslage Dänemark" describes Denmark's starting situation. It highlights a Nordic social democratic welfare regime, top-5 KOF globalization index, and strong union density of about 67%.

Ausgangslage Dänemark

• Nordisches sozialdemokratisches Wohlfahrtsregime
• Hoher Globalisierungsindex (KOF: Top 5)
• Starke Gewerkschaftsdichte (ca. 67 %)

The slide "Globalisierungsverlierer" identifies low-skilled workers as the main losers from globalization, caused by import competition and offshoring. It lists consequences including unemployment, wage losses, and rising social inequality.

Globalisierungsverlierer

• Betroffen: Low-Skilled Worker
• Ursachen: Importkonkurrenz, Offshoring
• Folgen: Arbeitslosigkeit, Lohnverluste, soziale Ungleichheit

This slide serves as the section header for Section 04, titled "Forschungsfrage" (Research Question). The subtitle asks: "How does Denmark deal with globalization losers? Focus: Flexicurity and ALMPs."

Forschungsfrage

04

Forschungsfrage

Wie geht Dänemark mit Globalisierungsverlierern um? Fokus: Flexicurity und ALMPs.

The Flexicurity-Modell slide outlines a labor market framework with flexible hiring/firing, high social protection via generous unemployment benefits, and active policies like retraining and job placement. It achieves high employment rates and low structural unemployment through quick worker reintegration and a strong safety net.

Flexicurity-Modell

{ "features": [ { "icon": "🔄", "heading": "Flexible Arbeitsmärkte", "description": "Einfache Einstellung und Kündigung für wirtschaftliche Anpassungsfähigkeit." }, { "icon": "🛡️", "heading": "Hoher Sozialschutz", "description": "Generöse Arbeitslosenhilfe und umfassendes Sicherheitsnetz bieten Sicherheit." }, { "icon": "🎯", "heading": "Aktive Arbeitsmarktpolitik", "description": "Umschulungen, Jobvermittlung und Maßnahmen gegen Arbeitslosigkeit." }, { "icon": "📈", "heading": "Hohe Beschäftigungsquote", "description": "Fördert schnelle Wiedereingliederung und hohe Erwerbsbeteiligung." }, { "icon": "📉", "heading": "Niedrige Arbeitslosigkeit", "description": "Effektiv gegen strukturelle Arbeitslosigkeit durch kombinierte Säulen." } ] }

The slide on Arbeitsmarktreformen & ALMPs outlines goals of quickly reintegrating unemployed individuals into the labor market and minimizing unemployment duration via intensive support and employability promotion. It details measures including job centers for personal counseling, retraining programs to enhance qualifications, and wage subsidies for new job entries.

Arbeitsmarktreformen & ALMPs

Denmark boasts a low unemployment rate of 5%. ALMPs boost effectiveness by +20% in reducing long-term unemployment and drive higher employment rates.

Wirkungen der ALMPs

• 5%: Arbeitslosigkeitsrate

niedrig in Dänemark

• +20%: Wirksamkeit ALMPs

geringere Langzeitarbeitslosigkeit

• + höhere: Beschäftigungsquote

durch ALMP-Effekte

The slide contrasts pros and cons of a labor market model: pros include high adaptability via Flexicurity, low unemployment (~5%) despite globalization, and effective integration of displaced workers. Cons highlight high taxes (up to 50% burden), dependence on economic growth for active labor policies, and vulnerability in recessions.

Pro & Kontra

Denmark's Flexicurity model effectively minimizes the damages caused by globalization, according to the conclusion slide. The subtitle questions whether it is a success model for other countries.

Fazit

Dänemarks Flexicurity minimiert Globalisierungs-Schäden effektiv.

Erfolgsmodell für andere Länder?

This slide, titled "Literatur," lists key literature sources in bullet points. It features OECD Reports on Flexicurity, the KOF Globalisation Index, Lindvall & Rueda (2016), and further sources.

Literatur

• OECD Reports on Flexicurity
• KOF Globalisation Index
• Lindvall & Rueda (2016)
• Weitere Quellen