Scrum uses sprint-based iterations with fixed roles like PO, SM, and Dev, plus structured ceremonies such as Daily, Review, and Retro, to provide predictability and planning cadence. Kanban features continuous flow without sprints, WIP limits for throughput optimization, no prescribed roles or ceremonies, and emphasizes flexibility, efficiency, and quick adaptation.
Scrum vs Kanban Comparison
| Scrum | Kanban |
|---|
| Sprint-based with fixed iterations. Defined roles (PO, SM, Dev). Structured ceremonies (Daily, Review, Retro). Delivers predictability and cadence for planning. | Continuous flow without sprints. WIP limits to optimize throughput. No prescribed roles or ceremonies. Emphasizes flexibility, efficiency, and quick adaptation. |
Source: Agile Enablement Overview
Speaker Notes
Explain fit-for-purpose use cases for each framework. Scrum offers structure and predictability for teams needing defined cadences. Kanban provides flexibility and flow for variable workloads. Recommend hybrid approach for scalability across projects.