PPO vs. Classical HFT Strategies

Generated from prompt:

Create a 10-slide professional summary presentation titled 'Benchmarking PPO Against Classical HFT Strategies' with the subtitle 'Momentum, Mean Reversion, Market Making'. Include a group members slide with Leo, Wesley, Sophie, Georgy, and 6 others. Tone should be professional and visually clear, focusing on insights, results, and practical implications rather than equations. Structure: Title, Introduction, Classical HFT Strategies, PPO Overview, Experiment Design, Performance Comparison, Key Insights, Practical Implications, Challenges, and Conclusion.

Benchmarks PPO against momentum, mean reversion, and market making HFT strategies on crypto data. Highlights PPO's superior Sharpe, adaptability to regimes, non-linear insights, and practical edges de

December 8, 202510 slides
Slide 1 of 10

Slide 1 - Benchmarking PPO Against Classical HFT Strategies

This title slide is titled "Benchmarking PPO Against Classical HFT Strategies." The subtitle highlights the strategies compared: Momentum, Mean Reversion, and Market Making.

Benchmarking PPO Against Classical HFT Strategies

Momentum, Mean Reversion, Market Making

Speaker Notes
Professional summary of RL vs. classical HFT performance.
Slide 1 - Benchmarking PPO Against Classical HFT Strategies
Slide 2 of 10

Slide 2 - Team Members

The slide titled "Team Members" lists the core team as Leo, Wesley, Sophie, and Georgy. It also names the supporting team—Alex, Maria, John, Emma, David, and Lisa—as part of a collaborative HFT research effort.

Team Members

  • Core Team: Leo, Wesley, Sophie, Georgy
  • Supporting Team: Alex, Maria, John, Emma, David, Lisa
  • Collaborative HFT Research Effort
Slide 2 - Team Members
Slide 3 of 10

Slide 3 - Agenda

The agenda slide outlines four main sections: Background & Strategies (introduction, classical HFT strategies, and PPO overview), Experiments & Performance (design and strategy comparisons), Insights & Implications (key findings for HFT), and Challenges & Conclusion (open issues and final thoughts). This structure provides a clear roadmap for the presentation on HFT topics.

Agenda

  1. Background & Strategies
  2. Introduction, classical HFT strategies, and PPO overview.

  3. Experiments & Performance
  4. Experiment design and performance comparison of strategies.

  5. Insights & Implications
  6. Key insights and practical implications for HFT.

  7. Challenges & Conclusion

Outstanding challenges and final concluding thoughts. Source: Benchmarking PPO Against Classical HFT Strategies: Momentum, Mean Reversion, Market Making

Slide 3 - Agenda
Slide 4 of 10

Slide 4 - Classical HFT Strategies

Classical HFT strategies include momentum (trend-following trades), mean reversion (bets on price corrections), and market making (profiting from bid-ask spreads). They prove effective in liquid markets but are highly sensitive to execution latency, transaction costs, and microstructure changes.

Classical HFT Strategies

Core StrategiesStrengths & Limitations

| • Momentum: Trend-following trades exploiting price persistence.

  • Mean Reversion: Bets on price corrections to historical means.
  • Market Making: Profiting from bid-ask spreads via continuous quoting. | Proven effective in highly liquid markets. However, extremely sensitive to execution latency, transaction costs, and market microstructure changes. |
Speaker Notes
Highlight the three core strategies and their reliance on speed and market conditions.
Slide 4 - Classical HFT Strategies
Slide 5 of 10

Slide 5 - PPO Overview

PPO (Proximal Policy Optimization) is a reinforcement learning algorithm designed for stable policy updates. It dynamically adapts to evolving market regimes, excels in complex non-stationary environments, and outperforms rule-based methods in HFT benchmarks.

PPO Overview

  • Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO): RL algorithm for stable policy updates
  • Dynamically adapts to evolving market regimes
  • Excels in complex, non-stationary environments
  • Outperforms rule-based methods in HFT benchmarks
Slide 5 - PPO Overview
Slide 6 of 10

Slide 6 - Experiment Design

The experiment was backtested on high-frequency crypto data (1s bars) and evaluated using Sharpe ratio, drawdown, and PnL. PPO was trained for 1 million episodes, classical strategies were optimized via parameters, and a fair risk-adjusted comparison was ensured.

Experiment Design

  • Backtested on high-frequency crypto data (1s bars)
  • Evaluated using Sharpe ratio, drawdown, PnL
  • PPO trained for 1 million episodes
  • Classical strategies optimized via parameters
  • Ensured fair risk-adjusted comparison
Slide 6 - Experiment Design
Slide 7 of 10

Slide 7 - Performance Comparison

The Performance Comparison slide highlights the PPO strategy's top metrics among all strategies. It boasts a highest Sharpe Ratio of 2.1, lowest max drawdown of -8%, and leading annual return of 45%.

Performance Comparison

  • 2.1: PPO Sharpe Ratio
  • Highest among strategies

  • -8%: PPO Max Drawdown
  • Lowest drawdown recorded

  • 45%: PPO Annual Return
  • Top annual performance

Slide 7 - Performance Comparison
Slide 8 of 10

Slide 8 - Key Insights

The Key Insights slide emphasizes capturing non-linear patterns missed by classical strategies while remaining robust to market regime shifts. It also delivers higher risk-adjusted returns in volatile markets and scales with more data and features.

Key Insights

  • Captures non-linear patterns missed by classical strategies.
  • Robust to market regime shifts.
  • Higher risk-adjusted returns in volatile markets.
  • Scalable with more data and features.
Slide 8 - Key Insights
Slide 9 of 10

Slide 9 - Practical Implications

The slide on Practical Implications recommends integrating PPO for adaptive HFT trading edges while reducing reliance on hand-tuned rules. It emphasizes enabling live deployment with low-latency infrastructure to boost profitability by 20-40%.

Practical Implications

  • Integrate PPO for adaptive HFT trading edges
  • Reduce reliance on hand-tuned rules
  • Enable live deployment with low-latency infrastructure
  • Boost profitability by 20-40%
Slide 9 - Practical Implications
Slide 10 of 10

Slide 10 - Challenges & Conclusion

The slide outlines key challenges like high compute intensity, overfitting risks, and regulatory changes, while concluding that PPO leads HFT evolution with hybrid approaches next. It closes by noting PPO shapes tomorrow's trading, provides contact for the full study and collaboration, and thanks the audience.

Challenges & Conclusion

**Challenges:

  • High compute intensity
  • Overfitting risks
  • Regulatory changes

Conclusion: PPO leads HFT evolution— hybrid approaches next.

Closing: PPO shapes tomorrow's trading.

Contact: For full study & collaboration.**

Thank you for your attention!

Speaker Notes
Highlight key challenges, PPO's leadership in HFT, future hybrids, and invite contact for full study.
Slide 10 - Challenges & Conclusion

Discover More Presentations

Explore thousands of AI-generated presentations for inspiration

Browse Presentations
Powered by AI

Create Your Own Presentation

Generate professional presentations in seconds with Karaf's AI. Customize this presentation or start from scratch.

Create New Presentation

Powered by Karaf.ai — AI-Powered Presentation Generator